Crowe's exoneration may relieve Mark Waugh
Paritosh Parasher
The exoneration of New Zealand's former star batsman Martin Crowe from match-fixing charges should provide some relief to Australian cricketer Mark Waugh, also accused of accepting money
from an Indian bookmaker.
Media circles believe Crowe, who was exonerated by an inquiry,
commissioned by New Zealand cricket authorities, may take legal action against
Delhi-based bookmaker Mukesh Gupta for wrongly accusing him of
match-fixing.
On the other hand, the inquiry report into charges against Waugh
is likely to be submitted next week. Greg Melick, a former Australian police
officer, is conducting the investigation.
While Waugh still awaits the verdict on charges by Gupta, Crowe is
a relieved man as he has been totally absolved of the bribery charges. The New
Zealand inquiry has, in fact, put the heat back on Gupta.
Crowe will meet his solicitor David Howman next week to consider
going on the offensive with action against Gupta and media outlets that
published the damning allegations.
Gupta had accused Crowe of accepting bribes of $20,000 in 1992 for
throwing cricket games. He had also alleged that he paid the same amount to
Waugh for information at a six-a-side tournament in Hong Kong in 1993.
Gupta submitted these testimonies in front of India's Central
Bureau of Investigation. Among other discrepancies in Gupta's
allegations against Crowe, the most glaring was he had visited the New Zealand
home of Crowe and met his then wife Simone Crowe.
The New Zealand anti-corruption inquiry noted that the New Zealand
Immigration Service "after an exhaustive search" advised there was
no record of anyone called "Makes Gupta" entering the country in 1991 or
1992.
Simone refused to attend the inquiry, but submitted a written
statement in which she denied Gupta's allegations.
The inquiry report, co-authored by Sir Ian Barker and Nick
Davidson, QC, has not only cleared Crowe of any wrong doing but also praised him as
an "honest man who has told the truth" and said his name had been "most
unfairly sullied".
The report, however, did admit that Crowe "...received money from
a person whom he now understood to be Gupta, without realizing he was a
bookmaker".
When Gupta made his allegations late last year, Crowe confessed to
being paid $3,000 for what he thought was for writing on the 1992 World
Cup.
Crowe has told the inquiry commission he thought he was to be paid
for "writing articles from a captain's perspective for syndication in
India".
But, interestingly, though Crowe admitted taking $3,000 from
Gupta, a subsequent examination of Crowe's bank account showed no sum of either
$3,000 or, as alleged by Gupta, $20,000 being deposited in it.
Crowe played cricket for New Zealand between 1982 and 1995. He was
captain from 1990 to 1994. He played 77 Tests and 143 One Day
International matches for New Zealand.
Martin Crowe is the latest Test player to be let off lightly.
Before him at three other players -- England's Alec Stewart and Sri Lankans
Aravinda de Silva and Arjuna Ranatunga -- accused of being involved in
match-fixing by Gupta were exonerated by their respective cricket administrators.
Only Mark Waugh and West Indies star Brian Lara are yet to get
their names cleared. But Gupta's evidences has led to bans on at
least two Test cricketers, Mohammed Azharuddin of India and Hansie Cronje of
South Africa.
Three others, Ajay Sharma (India), Salim Malik and Ata-ur-Rehman
(both Pakistan) have also been banned for life for allegedly indulging
in match-fixing activities.
-Indo-Asian News Service